1960 Jaguar MK II vs. 1998 Lotus 340 R

To start off, 1998 Lotus 340 R is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus 340 R (190 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1960 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus 340 R should accelerate faster than 1960 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 775 kg more than 1998 Lotus 340 R.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus 340 R (198 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus 340 R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar MK II.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Jaguar MK II 1998 Lotus 340 R
Make Jaguar Lotus
Model MK II 340 R
Year Released 1960 1998
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 2483 cc 1795 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 190 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 7800 RPM
Torque 195 Nm 198 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1450 kg 675 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 3510 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1600 mm 1130 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2320 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 72 L