1960 Jaguar MK II vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1999 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 570 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Clio. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1960 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Jaguar MK II | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | MK II | Clio |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2483 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 69.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 50 L |
