1960 Jaguar MK II vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart weights approximately 25 kg more than 1960 Jaguar MK II.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart. (185 Nm). This means 1960 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar MK II | 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | MK II | Smart |
Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 1689 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 185 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3230 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 88 L |