1960 Jaguar MK II vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1960 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1960 Jaguar MK II.
Because 1960 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar MK II | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | MK II | Clio |
Year Released | 1960 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |