1960 Jaguar MK II vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 5,980 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S (604 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 484 more horse power than 1960 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1960 Jaguar MK II.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S (1,000 Nm @ 200 RPM) has 805 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar MK II | 2009 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | MK II | S |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 5980 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 604 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 1000 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 14.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 90 L |