1960 Jaguar MK IX vs. 2005 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC70 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jaguar MK IX (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2005 Volvo XC70. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jaguar MK IX should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo XC70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar MK IX weights approximately 147 kg more than 2005 Volvo XC70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Jaguar MK IX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC70 (340 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar MK IX. (330 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar MK IX.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar MK IX | 2005 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | MK IX | XC70 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1658 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |