1960 Jaguar MK IX vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 173 kg more than 1960 Jaguar MK IX.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Jaguar MK IX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar MK IX. (330 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar MK IX.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar MK IX | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | MK IX | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2499 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1978 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |