1960 Jaguar MK IX vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jaguar MK IX (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (147 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jaguar MK IX should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar MK IX weights approximately 450 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Jaguar MK IX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Jaguar MK IX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jaguar MK IX (330 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1960 Jaguar MK IX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar MK IX | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | MK IX | 6 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 64 L |