1960 Jaguar MK IX vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jaguar MK IX (220 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jaguar MK IX should accelerate faster than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Jaguar MK IX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jaguar MK IX (330 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (320 Nm). This means 1960 Jaguar MK IX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Jaguar MK IX | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
| Model | MK IX | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 80 L |
