1960 Jaguar XK vs. 1984 Subaru Rex
To start off, 1984 Subaru Rex is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar XK weights approximately 863 kg more than 1984 Subaru Rex.
Because 1960 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Subaru Rex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Jaguar XK | 1984 Subaru Rex | |
| Make | Jaguar | Subaru |
| Model | XK | Rex |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 548 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 56 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 55.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 32 L |
