1960 Jaguar XK vs. 2000 Lotus GT 1
To start off, 2000 Lotus GT 1 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotus GT 1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus GT 1 (573 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 386 more horse power than 1960 Jaguar XK. (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus GT 1 should accelerate faster than 1960 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar XK weights approximately 423 kg more than 2000 Lotus GT 1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus GT 1 (391 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar XK. (310 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Lotus GT 1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar XK | 2000 Lotus GT 1 | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | XK | GT 1 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 3506 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 573 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 391 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2690 mm |