1960 Jaguar XK vs. 2003 Audi TT
To start off, 2003 Audi TT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jaguar XK (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2003 Audi TT. (161 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar XK weights approximately 163 kg more than 2003 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jaguar XK (310 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi TT. (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 1960 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Jaguar XK | 2003 Audi TT | |
| Make | Jaguar | Audi |
| Model | XK | TT |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1950 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 81.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 55 L |
