1960 Jaguar XK vs. 2003 Honda Integra
To start off, 2003 Honda Integra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda Integra (217 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1960 Jaguar XK. (187 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1960 Jaguar XK.
Because 1960 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar XK | 2003 Honda Integra | |
Make | Jaguar | Honda |
Model | XK | Integra |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 50 L |