1960 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2005 Mazda Etude is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jaguar XK (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Etude. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Etude. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar XK weights approximately 380 kg more than 2005 Mazda Etude. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jaguar XK (310 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Etude. (168 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1960 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Etude.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar XK | 2005 Mazda Etude | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | Etude |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1839 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 168 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 1093 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 55 L |