1960 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1960 Jaguar XK. (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1960 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 418 kg more than 1960 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Tundra (382 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar XK. (310 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar XK | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XK | Tundra |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 1891 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 100 L |