1960 Jaguar XK vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jaguar XK (187 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar XK. (310 Nm). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar XK | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Jaguar | Citroen |
Model | XK | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |