1960 Jaguar XK vs. 2011 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1960 Jaguar XK. (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1960 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jaguar XK weights approximately 83 kg more than 2011 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jaguar XK (310 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda RX-8. (215 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1960 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar XK | 2011 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1473 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1341 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2703 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 64 L |