1960 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jaguar XK (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot 5008. (154 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot 5008.
Because 1960 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 5008, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jaguar XK (310 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Peugeot 5008. (240 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1960 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Peugeot 5008.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jaguar XK | 2012 Peugeot 5008 | |
Make | Jaguar | Peugeot |
Model | XK | 5008 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1835 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2735 mm |