1960 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1996 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 1996 Marcos Mantis is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Marcos Mantis (352 HP) has 293 more horse power than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1960 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Marcos Mantis. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Marcos Mantis (407 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 1996 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Jeep CJ5 | 1996 Marcos Mantis | |
| Make | Jeep | Marcos |
| Model | CJ5 | Mantis |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 352 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2290 mm |
