1960 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2001 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2001 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 5 kg more than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1960 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1960 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Jeep CJ5 | 2001 Seat Inca Kombi | |
| Make | Jeep | Seat |
| Model | CJ5 | Inca Kombi |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1391 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1035 kg |
