1960 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1960 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda CR-V weights approximately 448 kg more than 1960 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2003 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jeep CJ5 | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Jeep | Honda |
Model | CJ5 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |