1960 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 1960 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1960 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Kia K2700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jeep CJ5 | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Jeep | Kia |
Model | CJ5 | K2700 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2380 mm |