1960 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2005 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2005 Subaru Forester is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,456 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Subaru Forester (210 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1960 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Subaru Forester weights approximately 433 kg more than 1960 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Subaru Forester (319 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jeep CJ5 | 2005 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | CJ5 | Forester |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2456 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1463 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2430 mm |