1960 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1960 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi TT weights approximately 510 kg more than 1960 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (349 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jeep CJ5 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | CJ5 | TT |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4199 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1351 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2469 mm |