1960 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jeep CJ5 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Jeep | Citroen |
Model | CJ5 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 380 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |