1960 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1960 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Micra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1960 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jeep CJ5 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | CJ5 | Micra |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2449 mm |