1960 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2012 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2012 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Saab 05-Sep (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Saab 05-Sep (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jeep CJ5. 2012 Saab 05-Sep has automatic transmission and 1960 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Saab 05-Sep will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jeep CJ5 | 2012 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | Jeep | Saab |
Model | CJ5 | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 5009 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1468 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2837 mm |