1960 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 850 kg more than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC70 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jeep CJ5. 2012 Volvo XC70 has automatic transmission and 1960 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Jeep CJ5 | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Jeep | Volvo |
| Model | CJ5 | XC70 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4838 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1604 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2815 mm |
