1960 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher.
Because 1960 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 1960 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1960 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Jeep CJ5 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Jeep | Smart |
Model | CJ5 | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 1867 mm |