1960 Lancia Flaminia vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1966 Riley Kestrel is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lancia Flaminia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lancia Flaminia would be higher. At 2,458 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Lancia Flaminia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Lancia Flaminia (100 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Lancia Flaminia should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Lancia Flaminia weights approximately 553 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Lancia Flaminia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lancia Flaminia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Lancia Flaminia (187 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1960 Lancia Flaminia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Lancia Flaminia | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Lancia | Riley |
Model | Flaminia | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1960 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 187 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1438 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 25 L |