1960 Lancia Flaminia vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lancia Flaminia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lancia Flaminia would be higher. At 2,458 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Lancia Flaminia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1960 Lancia Flaminia. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1960 Lancia Flaminia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 197 kg more than 1960 Lancia Flaminia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Lancia Flaminia. (187 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Lancia Flaminia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Lancia Flaminia | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Lancia | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Flaminia | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2458 cc | 2374 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1273 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.3 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 59 L |
