1960 Lancia Flaminia vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lancia Flaminia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lancia Flaminia would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Lancia Flaminia weights approximately 185 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 1960 Lancia Flaminia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lancia Flaminia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (279 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Lancia Flaminia. (186 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Lancia Flaminia.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Lancia Flaminia | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Lancia | Mini |
Model | Flaminia | Roadster |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 279 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.5 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3758 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1391 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 50 L |