1960 Lancia Flavia vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1960 Lancia Flavia. (91 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Lancia Flavia.
Because 2003 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Lancia Flavia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (205 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Lancia Flavia. (115 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Lancia Flavia.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Lancia Flavia | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Flavia | 6 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 94 mm |
Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 62 L |