1960 Lancia Flavia vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1960 Lancia Flavia. (91 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1960 Lancia Flavia.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Lancia Flavia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (373 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Lancia Flavia. (115 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Lancia Flavia.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Lancia Flavia | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Lancia | Cadillac |
Model | Flavia | ATS |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1417 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 61 L |