1960 Land Rover 88 vs. 1998 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1998 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Land Rover 88. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Land Rover 88 would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Toyota 4Runner (123 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1960 Land Rover 88. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1960 Land Rover 88. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 390 kg more than 1960 Land Rover 88. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Toyota 4Runner (295 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Land Rover 88. (157 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Land Rover 88.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Land Rover 88 | 1998 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
Model | 88 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1960 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2286 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |