1960 Land Rover 88 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Land Rover 88. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Land Rover 88 would be higher. At 2,286 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Land Rover 88 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1960 Land Rover 88. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1960 Land Rover 88.
Because 1960 Land Rover 88 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Land Rover 88 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Land Rover 88 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | 88 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2286 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2490 mm |