1960 Land Rover 88 vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Land Rover 88. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Land Rover 88 would be higher. At 2,286 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Land Rover 88 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford C-Max (150 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1960 Land Rover 88. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1960 Land Rover 88. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Land Rover 88 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2012 Ford C-Max.
Because 1960 Land Rover 88 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford C-Max. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Land Rover 88 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford C-Max (240 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Land Rover 88. (157 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Land Rover 88.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Land Rover 88 | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | 88 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2286 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2648 mm |