1960 Lotus Elite vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,216 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Lotus Elite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Elite. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 388 kg more than 1960 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Lotus Elite (104 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1960 Lotus Elite will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1960 Lotus Elite has manual transmission. 1960 Lotus Elite will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Lotus Elite | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Lotus | MCC |
Model | Elite | Smart |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 100 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.7 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 582 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 47 L |