1960 Lotus Elite vs. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (239 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Elite. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 1338 kg more than 1960 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (382 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Lotus Elite. (104 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Lotus Elite | 2004 Mercury Mountaineer | |
| Make | Lotus | Mercury |
| Model | Elite | Mountaineer |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1216 cc | 4604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 239 HP |
| Torque | 104 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.7 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 582 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 85 L |
