1960 Lotus Elite vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Elite. (71 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 978 kg more than 1960 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Lotus Elite. (104 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Lotus Elite | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Lotus | Rover |
Model | Elite | 75 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1216 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.7 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 582 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 65 L |