1960 Lotus Seven vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1969 Riley Kestrel is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Riley Kestrel (64 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (36 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 475 kg more than 1960 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Lotus Seven | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Lotus | Riley |
| Model | Seven | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 946 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 435 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 25 L |
