1960 Lotus Seven vs. 1990 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 1990 Plymouth Voyager is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Plymouth Voyager (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Voyager should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Because 1960 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Lotus Seven | 1990 Plymouth Voyager | |
Make | Lotus | Plymouth |
Model | Seven | Voyager |
Year Released | 1960 | 1990 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2860 mm |