1960 Lotus Seven vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1995 Rover 200 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (36 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 200 weights approximately 771 kg more than 1960 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Lotus Seven | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Lotus | Rover |
Model | Seven | 200 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 946 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 435 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2510 mm |