1960 Lotus Seven vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Because 1960 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Lotus Seven | 1996 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Seven | Colt |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2430 mm |