1960 Lotus Seven vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,839 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Roadster (157 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (36 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Roadster should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Roadster weights approximately 625 kg more than 1960 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Lotus Seven | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Seven | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 946 cc | 1839 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 157 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 435 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 48 L |
