1960 Lotus Seven vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,838 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (119 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Because 1960 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Lotus Seven | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Seven | 6 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1838 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 64 L |