1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 1960 Mazda R 360 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 764 cc (2 cylinders), 1951 Saab 92 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Saab 92 (24 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92 should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Saab 92 weights approximately 425 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Mazda R 360 | 1951 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Mazda | Saab |
| Model | R 360 | 92 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1951 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2480 mm |
