1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1960 Mazda R 360 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Mazda R 360 | 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Mazda | Rolls-Royce |
Model | R 360 | Phantom |
Year Released | 1960 | 1953 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 3690 mm |