1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 1440 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Mazda R 360 | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | R 360 | Starfire |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 355 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |
