1960 Mazda R 360 vs. 1975 Seat 131
To start off, 1975 Seat 131 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Seat 131 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Seat 131 (53 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Seat 131 should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Seat 131 weights approximately 585 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Seat 131 (95 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1975 Seat 131 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Mazda R 360 | 1975 Seat 131 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | R 360 | 131 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1975 |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 22 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2500 mm |